What would be the consequences of the legalization of physician assisted suicide

Furthermore, the society in the Netherlands is very different from many other societies because of the strong emphasis upon individual freedom of choice and limited government control. If passed, Victoria will become the first Australian jurisdiction since the Northern Territory in to legalise assisted dying.

This does not suggest that Oregon hospice care is improving its ability to address all cases of pain in terminally ill patients. This proposal seems like a helpful safeguard to prevent the suicide of patients who act precipitously, or who are acting out of character in a way that may signal an as-yet-undiagnosed mental illness.

Specifically, the family is unlikely to interpret the suicide as an angry or rejecting action directed at themselves. The concept of "distributive justice"involves looking at the collective good or general welfare as something to be shared among the total membership of society.

Further articles of interest about this case include: The actual suicide attempt is often done impulsively, in the midst of an acute crisis or while intoxicated or emotionally distressed. Also, there are no generally accepted criteria of what constitutes a rational argument in favor of euthanasia: Financial conditions may lead to assisted suicide as an answer to those rising costs.

Advocates of legalizing physician-assisted suicide tend to view the family relationship among the potential safeguards which assure that a right to suicide assistance will not be abused. Protection from criminal and civil liability for practitioners who act in accordance with the Act.

Hastings Center Report, 22, Most cases of euthanasia occur among terminally ill persons in the advanced stages of their disease and it is rare that the criteria are not respected.

The original Bill proposed that any person expected to die within 12 months could access VAD. Law purports to regulate end-of-life care but its role in decision-making by doctors is not clear. The Terms of Reference require the Committee to inquire into and report on: Conscientious objection A health practitioner with a conscientious objection to VAD has the right to refuse to provide information about VAD to a patient, and to participate in any part of the VAD process including supplying, prescribing or administering a VAD substance, or being present when a VAD substance is administered.

A person is not eligible to access VAD only because they have a disability, or are diagnosed with a mental illness.


Euthanasia advocates know that when they equate assisted suicide and modern pain management, they are not just elevating the status of assisted suicide—among people who oppose direct killing of the innocent, they are undermining good pain control.

The converse is also true: It is understood drafting of the legislation will commence shortly, with a Bill to be introduced in Victorian Parliament in coming months.

Key provisions of the Act Eligibility criteria In order to access VAD, a person must meet strict eligibility criteria, including that the person must: The terminally ill sedated patient may later be withdrawn from the sedatives and brought back to consciousness, with his or her pain under control.

Who should make the decision about withdrawing treatment. Is this really the same thing as deliberately killing a patient. Although the physician hooked up and turned on the apparatus, the lethal injection was only given after the patient responded to a question on the computer screen by pressing on a key.

Only recently has the medical profession begun to appreciate that unrelieved pain can itself hasten death. Presumably the family will help to assure that the patient's choice is truly voluntary and that the patient has appropriately sought out other care options before concluding that death through suicide is the only effective way to avoid further suffering.

Physician-assisted suicide is not compatible with those roles. Every suicide is tragic. After all, the issues are whether the patient has chosen freely and whether the patient is truly suffering; and the family members, especially if they have their own emotional problems or dysfunctions to deal with, may be singularly unhelpful in determining either how free was the patient's choice, or how badly the patient is suffering.

Now this patient doesn't want it, and I do not know what to do". The overall impact was substantial in terms of both the bed days and cost incurred. This is not a medical-legal standard of care, and is not applicable to any legitimate medical treatment. Current practices utilised in the medical community to assist a person to exercise their preference in managing the end of their life, including palliative care; ACT community views on the desirability of voluntary assisted dying being legislated in the ACT; Risks to individuals and the community associated with voluntary assisted dying and whether and how these can be managed; The applicability of voluntary assisted dying schemes operating in other jurisdictions to the ACT, particularly the Victorian scheme; The impact of Federal legislation on the ACT determining its own policy on voluntary assisted dying and the process for achieving change; and Any other relevant matter.

The conference brought together researchers, practitioners and community members from a wide range of disciplines across the globe to explore emerging ethical, legal and medical issues that confront people when they die.

While some terminally ill patients may die under such sedation, this is generally because they were imminently dying already. I appreciate the opportunity to participate in this discussion, and to provide some additional information that may not be known by many Oregonians.

Review The Act will be reviewed by the Minister in its fifth year of operation.


Pain can be treated. But if the disease is not only incurable but also full of continuous pain and anguish, then the priests and magistrates exhort the patient saying that he has become.

To be an assistant to the death or suicide of another human being is another issue that is removed from physician-assisted suicide. For the purposes of this argument, the focus will be on the involvement of a medical professional in the oversight and management of a suicide or, in other words, physician-assisted, rather than simply assisted suicide.

In many respects physician-assisted suicide raises many of the same ethical and professional issues as euthanasia because in both cases the physician is complicit in the patient's death.

There is extensive literature on the physician-assisted suicide debate. Killing the Pain Not the Patient: Palliative Care vs Assisted Suicide. Legalizing assisted suicide would augment real dangers that negate genuine choice and self-determi nation.

In view of this reality, we explore many of the disability-related effects of assisted suicide, while also addressing the larger social.

America's largest doctors' lobby may reconsider its opposition to assisted suicide after its governing body voted to ignore its own ethics council. New York Health Law is published by the Farrell Fritz Healthcare practice group and covers issues around health law in New York State.

What would be the consequences of the legalization of physician assisted suicide
Rated 4/5 based on 23 review
Quotations on Euthanasia